Friday 25 November 2016

New Securities Law Requirements

“WARNING! This investment is risky”: New securities law requirements coming this May/15 for Ontario businesses will put your Love (Money) to the test!

In many instances, the first source of funds for new ventures by Ontario entrepreneurs is so-called “love money” from family members, friends and business contacts.  But there is no doubt the bonds of love and friendship will be tested after May 5 2015 with the recently announced introduction in Ontario of a family, friends and business associates prospectus exemption (“FFBA Exemption”) to replace the current founder, control person and family exemption, along with additional changes adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators to the accredited investor exemption (“AI Exemption”).  So don’t be caught off guard: Ontario entrepreneurs embarking on capital-raising activities are advised to seek advice well before the end of April on the changes described briefly below to the exempt market landscape.

How strong is the love or friendship of your start-up investors?
·         One highly visible change is the requirement to provide investors with a risk acknowledgement form that begins with the following words: “WARNING! This investment is risky. Don’t invest unless you can afford to lose all the money you pay for this investment.”
·         New Form 45-106F12 to be completed by all FFBA Exemption investors requires the investor to describe the relationship with the director, executive officer, control person or founder of an issuer (“principal”) or spouse of a principal, and must be signed by the investor, the principal and the issuer.
·         New Form 45-106F9 to be completed by individual AI Exemption investors requires an individual investor to confirm his or her accredited investor status using certain “bright-line” income or asset tests, and for the issuer to confirm this information.
·         In both cases, the issuer is required to keep the relevant form for eight years after the financing.
Will Ontario entrepreneurs need to keep detailed notes on their close personal friends and close business associates? 

So how “close” are you and your personal friend or business associate?  Securities regulators have tried to give guidance as to who qualifies as a “close personal friend” and “close business associate” for purposes of the FFBA Exemption and the private issuer exemption described in National Instrument 45-106 (“PI Exemption”).
Securities regulators suggest that issuers should gather details about the length of time the individual investor has known the principal, and the nature of any personal relationships between the individual investor and the principal, including, the frequency of contact between them and the level of trust and reliance in the other circumstances.  With respect to close business associates, information is also required regarding the nature of any specific business relationships between the individual and the principal, including, for each relationship, when it began, the frequency of contact between them and when it terminated if it is not ongoing, and the nature and number of any business dealings between the individual investor and principal, the length of the period during which they occurred, and date of the most recent business dealing.
Who is considered a “close personal friend” or “close business associate”?

A close personal friend of a principal is an individual who knows the principal well enough and has known them for a sufficient period of time to be in a position to assess their capabilities and trustworthiness and to obtain information from them with respect to the investment.   A close personal friend can include a family member who is not specifically listed in the exemptions, such as the aunt, uncle or cousin of a principal of an issuer.  However, securities regulators have noted that an individual is not considered a close personal friend if the individual is solely a relative, a member of the same club, organization, association or religious group; a co-worker, colleague or associate at the same workplace; a client, customer, former client or former customer; a mere acquaintance; or connected through some form of social media, such as Facebook, Twitter or LinkedIn. An individual is also not considered a close personal friend if the relationship is primarily founded on participation in an Internet forum.  Similar criteria apply for an individual to qualify (or not) as a “close business associate”.
Securities regulators have indicated as well that they are interested in the number of “close personal friends” and “close business associates” to whom securities have been distributed in reliance on the FFBA exemption or PI exemption.
These are merely a glimpse of the changes which are scheduled to take effect on May 5, 2015.  Securities regulators have clearly stated that the responsibility is on the SELLER of securities to fully understand the terms and conditions of the exemption being relied on as they must be able to explain to an investor the meaning of the terms and conditions of the particular exemption, including the difference between alternative qualification criteria for the same exemption. The person relying on a prospectus exemption is responsible for determining whether the terms and conditions of the prospectus exemption are met, and should retain all necessary documents to demonstrate that they properly relied on the exemption. Standard investor representations in a subscription agreement or an investor’s initial beside a category on an accredited investor form are not sufficient, unless additional reasonable steps are also taken to verify the representations made by the investor, including gathering background information about the investor.


Bottom line:  There are now more rules around raising love-money from family, friends and business associates and accredited investors.  Ontario entrepreneurs are advised to proceed with caution and to obtain advice on the changes described above to understand the impact on their capital raising activities and to avoid costly securities law mistakes.